| Post new topic Reply to topic | Message |
|
||||
 |
Most economical means?
1 coaxial splitter 
You won't get surround, but if you need the TVs to be farther apart, coaxial is cheaper than composite/s-video, and usually longer in length. Good idea Nikon. What would be even cooler it to make an attachment that goes to the controller ports and can be fed into the computer (through serial most likely) and then shared. Then, by means of streaming video, allow players to compete against each other through the computer. It wouldn't work, though . Latency and a few other factors make it impractical. Dreamcast ™ |
|||
|
||||
 |
or you know, you could always change the size and placement of the screen on your monitor 
lol, Kingbuzzo. |
|||
| _________________ Pso: Kingbuzzo lvl 80 QUake 3: [OC] Kingbuzzo |
||||
|
||||
 |
kingbuzzo wrote:
or you know, you could always change the size and placement of the screen on your monitor
lol, Kingbuzzo. Nah, it won't cut off an entire 50% of the screen. Only about 30% is cut off when you move the screens placement on the monitor down / up. So another method of blocking off the screen it still necessary. |
|||
| _________________ I'm already numero uno on Dark Helmet's hit list... |
||||
|
||||
 |
I've been doing the exact same thing for years, only I've been using cheap RF splitters. The benefit to using VGA is most monitors allow you to re-size the screen, so you could make your screen a little larger. Of course, using an average sized TV more than makes up the difference, but VGA sure looks a hell of a lot better than Co-Ax RF... | |||
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum